Twitter bans violence - UNLESS it's perpetrated by the state / military
coinsh.redSubmitted by matches_malone in Anarchism (edited )
Submitted by matches_malone in Anarchism (edited )
Something something monopoly of force. Because that makes it a-okay.
Racism is also only ok if Trump does it:
https://www.cnet.com/news/twitters-new-abuse-enforcement-violence-rules-military-governments/
For a country that claims to be about holding govt accountable, that's real fucking suspect.
Or in other words: antifa bad. fa good.
And, of course, it won't be enforced when neonazis do it.
Weren't they crowing about a mass neonazi banning earlier? lol their site is still lousy with fascists.
So I guess we need a twiddle.me
I laughed
Isn't that Mastodon though? I've never really looked at it
However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or other uses.
When are people going to stop trying to profit from open communication and the sharing of ideas? It's infuriating.
I've been spoiled by raddle's TOS forever now :<
Never. Chuds gonna chud.
that's one instance of thousands... what about anticapitalist.party or witches.town or the countless others
It says all instances have to follow those terms plus each instance's individual rules:
By signing up you agree to follow the rules of the instance and our terms of service.
I guess its because they federate. If you weren't federated with them and didn't collect the info it would be impossible for social to get it. So it goes
Aw.
Perhaps GNU Social, previously known as StatusNet (and the old identi.ca which appears to now be based on something called pump.io ) could work here?
It already exists, its called mastodon. Join it
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
Violence is legal when the state does it don'tyaknow!