Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

__deleted_____ wrote (edited )

So I guess we need a


Ant wrote (edited )

I laughed

Isn't that Mastodon though? I've never really looked at it


Defasher wrote


ziq wrote (edited )

However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or other uses.

When are people going to stop trying to profit from open communication and the sharing of ideas? It's infuriating.


zombie_berkman wrote

that's one instance of thousands... what about or or the countless others


ziq wrote (edited )

It says all instances have to follow those terms plus each instance's individual rules:

By signing up you agree to follow the rules of the instance and our terms of service.


zombie_berkman wrote

I guess its because they federate. If you weren't federated with them and didn't collect the info it would be impossible for social to get it. So it goes


lambda wrote

Perhaps GNU Social, previously known as StatusNet (and the old which appears to now be based on something called ) could work here?