Submitted by Tequila_Wolf in Anarchism (edited )
kin wrote
Reply to comment by herewegoagain in A comparative note on the contentious topic of indiscriminate attack by Tequila_Wolf
So, let me rephrase that:
Terrorist attack are not a thing for any RECENT indigenous movement
herewegoagain wrote (edited )
Terrorist attack are not a thing for any RECENT indigenous movement
I don't know where you're getting this from tbh. The Bougainvillians against Australia. The Niger Delta warriors against the UK. The Mujahideen against Russia...
kin wrote
So, let me rephrase that (again):
Terrorist attack are not a thing for any RECENT indigenous movement linked to eco-terrorism
Mujahideen u pushed to far mate, they are native alright but indigenous suppose a different category of people.
Maybe you are making digging too deep in this hill, but I'll die here
Fuck off with this ITS apologia
anarchyintheyouuuk wrote
Terrorist attack are not a thing for any RECENT indigenous movement linked to eco-terrorism
The Niger Delta warriors bombing the oil corporations (indiscriminately killing hundreds so far, including children) aren't eco enough for you?
Mujahideen u pushed to far mate, they are native alright but indigenous suppose a different category of people.
I'm guessing that category of people is 'cuddly natives who white people think are cool'?
Here's the story about the most cuddly of all natives, Ishi, last of the Yahi tribe, and the terror his people inflicted on everyone who wasn't Yahi: https://ia-petabox.archive.org/details/IshiAndTheWarAgainstCivilizationSecondEdition/
Buuut I doubt you'll see what's in front of you, and will instead, again, try to redefine what is meant by indigenous, or what is meant by terror, or what is meant by eco. I'm reminded of this letter: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-ted-k-responds-to-kevin-tucker
"In my extensive correspondence with Kevin, he would never under any circumstances admit that he was wrong about anything. Whenever I pointed out a fact that he found inconvenient, he would manipulate words, assigning eccentric meanings to them in order to make the inconvenient fact go away."
kin wrote
Ok, I don't want to win this debate..
Is not me that is trying to change the definitions every post. But anyways eco-terrorism and eco-extremism are new concepts. Its like saying that the old Incas were Maoists or other fake correlation.
Why the continuous need to legitimize the movement appropriating indigenous struggle? If you want to be eco extreme go for it, you don't need anyone seal of approval..
And quoting uncle Ted is pointless for me, he was a protofash incel imho.
Sometimes Raddle is everything what the people criticize.
herewegoagain wrote
And quoting uncle Ted is pointless for me, he was a protofash incel imho.
'Everyone is a fascist except me.'
kin wrote
Aww
here_we_go_again
[deleted] wrote (edited )
herewegoagain wrote
what's your problem with terror, styx?
yes, some non-white and some indigenous people are terrorists. some white people are terrorists. idk why an anarchist would be so upset about this.
and no, being a terrorist doesn't make you a fascist. using asymmetrical violence (usually for political ends, but also anti-political) makes you a terrorist. again, idk why an anarchist would be so upset about the idea.
you might not like him, but obvs ted k isn't a fascist. and obvs neither am i. it says a lot about you two that you can't hold a conversation without resorting to bookchin-esque name calling with anyone who disagrees with you.
kin wrote (edited )
It's ashame that even in the internet people need to make throwaway acc to make comments here and got upvoted for bad takes.. sometimes I don't know what the problem with Raddle is
Ps: it's old drama for anyone wondering
[deleted] wrote
banhammer wrote
Banned for daring to disagree with one of the mods. Nice.
BTW, one of your other mods sent me a PM saying they'd call the cops on me. Real nice /anarchism you've got yourself here.
No reply to my question about terrorism, of course.
kin wrote
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Wooooooeowowoowowowoowowowo
this is the sound of the police
Where I say that I would call the police on you? It's easy to lie here, am I right?
banhammered wrote
How was I meant to interpret a PM from a mod - who I presume has my IP address - saying 'wowowo this is the sound of the police' as anything other than a threat?
kin wrote
Yeah.. defending ITS and the whole shit and afraid of the state... It's good to feel anger again, yo brave to created alt accounts to downvoting a shitty thread comment but to afraid to keep your main account out of this.. when your belly is full is difficult to remember your priorities straight Am I right ?
kin wrote
If you need to create alts to express your opinion you can wait the ban.
Ho back to reddit, chump
kin wrote
Sometimes is good to live outside the internet.
So much for eco extremism
This is some entryist bullshit for fuck sake
kin wrote
Ok cut the crap, tell me, list just one eco-extremismt that isn't ecofascist too
kin wrote
I don't know why are you trying to push this narrative. Maybe you want to legitimate the ecofash from ITS?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments