Rights are building blocks of governmental, legal and moral systems, made up of enforceable claims and the dividing lines of general categories.
Whether we use positive or negative terms for our claims, rights appear as attempts in law-making: What is right can be enforced and generalized, what can be generalized and enforced is right.
In horizontal relations, I find such claims pretty insulting in their stubborn disregard for contextual particularities and for other options. They can function as threats, but more certainly create barriers for conflict resolution and mutual understanding.
Approaching anarchy, we wouldn't want to need any rights.
subrosa OP wrote
First go at it. Idk, could be a bit too 'dense', too philosophical.
For something a little more exhaustive, I need to find a way to incorporate this: