Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

flingwingin OP wrote

🍃
To sum up, the real difference relevant to the interests of social change is not class division, but the division between class division and the universal subjectivity of the oppressed. (And this last phrase, "universal subjectivity of the oppressed" isn't to say that all who fit 1.b HAVE this subjectivity, it's that we find it by going through the contradiction that's created when a society turns its dichotomy of person-object onto people, turning some into masters and others into servants who carry out the will of another (even temporarily). Most people of either class believe in this dichotomy, which is why we get lost in politics of gaining privilege and being a master more of the time, aka being saddled with cognitive dissonance less often. It's universal in the sense that it really is able to apply to everyone, all the time.)
🍃

2

Fool wrote (edited )

Note: my original comment meant nothing. This one is... Something else.

the real difference relevant to the interests of social change is not class division, but the division between class division and the universal subjectivity of the oppressed.

It's universal in the sense that it really is able to apply to everyone, all the time

What about those that are not subject of division and are one, embracing the void? That do not accept the concepts of class, subjectivity or oppression.

2