I didn't really understand what was interesting about this.
It seemed to reduce modern medicine to the medicines/technologies used to avoid death, which isn't the case. I am anti-tech but I found the angle for this specific piece a bit flimsy.
Were there any strong points? I found it hard to read all the way to the end.
Pax wrote
I didn't really understand what was interesting about this.
It seemed to reduce modern medicine to the medicines/technologies used to avoid death, which isn't the case. I am anti-tech but I found the angle for this specific piece a bit flimsy.
Were there any strong points? I found it hard to read all the way to the end.