There's a river in colorado used by 40 million people. It's drying up due to climate change. Those 40 million people can use direct democracy to save it. How? I seriously want to know.Gwen_Isilith wrote
Reply to comment by ziq in There's a river in colorado used by 40 million people. It's drying up due to climate change. Those 40 million people can use direct democracy to save it. How? I seriously want to know. by ziq
It seems a lot of post civ anarchists also use the term anti-civ despite being pretty clearly for civilization (primarily it's product).
ziq OP wrote
I haven't noticed that, I hope they're not trying to do entryism to subvert anticiv like all those anarcho marxists cropping up.
Gwen_Isilith wrote
Perhaps inhabit could be seen as the entryist position for post civ anarchy but I'm thinking more the text ""Take what you need and compost the rest" which has largely led to the coptation of anti-civ rhetoric to advocate using civilization. Largely its the idea that without capitalism civilized industry is somehow redeemable if scaled down.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments