Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Esperaux wrote

Reply to comment by kin in by !deleted32344

The two versions of anarchism that claim not to be communistic are often either capitalist in nature or despite their best intentions only reforming capitalism and preserving the very coercive forces that need to be abolished. Mutualists have their contributions to the theory but are even more archaic than the syndicalists. The agorists only react to the mechanisms of capitalism but still don't actually exist to abolish it.

1

kin wrote

The point I was trying to made is: trying to frame Anarchism as a Dichotomy between social Anarchism (communism) and individualist Anarchism (capitalist) is shallow. Trying to gatekeeping others Anarchisms will face resistance here.

I think you are making your point in good faith but preaching the communism gospel here will get no results here.

Anarchism is simple as the root of the word - no masters, either in economy or in democracy, etc. We don't need to complicated it.

3

kin wrote

And if you look, your posts had some approval here, even Bookchin stuff, but when you try to proselytize the a"Red Truth" you get all this reaction.

So this can say something about how we feel about this whole deal of "my anarchism is the only anarchism possible"

2