Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ruin wrote

I don’t think you need the * for ITS if you take them at their word regarding the “indiscriminate” nature of their attacks.

That is to say, I understand their use of the word whether or not I agree with their targets/tactics.

6

allatseaa wrote (edited )

I was mostly just clarifying to avoid drama. My interpretation of ITS is that for the first seven or eight communiques they were comparable to the other groups named above. After that, when they started calling themselves Wild Reaction (and may have even started numbering their communiques from #1 again, I can't really remember now) they were quite distinct from FAI, CCF etc, who they'd previously signed joint declarations with. The Wild Reacion ITS is the ITS of the Atassa journals, who I definitely wouldn't put in a list with EF!, ELF et al. Not because they're any less interesting, just because they're not part of the same sphere.

5

ruin wrote

That’s all fair. The drama around even referencing ITS, WR, and eco extremism is unfortunate.

6