Submitted by communistanarchist in Anarchism

As a communist anarchist, I believe a transitionary state is needed to get to the money-free stateless society that is anarcho communism. This used to be the more common strain of anarchism, to be a communist who wants to achieve anarchist after the revolution but here it seems to be a minority current somehow? Why is that?

−7

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

catachresis wrote

I believe a transitionary state is needed to get to the money-free stateless society

this is literally Marxism.

after the revolution

There is no after. Revolution is always happening. What you might be thinking of is called civil war.

Why is that?

Idk. Why are insisting that anarchy is compatible with transitional states and shitposting on other posts here?

7

Pax wrote

You can't be an anarchist and believe in an intermediary state, it's the main difference between marxists and anarchists

6

communistanarchist OP wrote

Haven't you ever heard of Anarcho Marxists?

−3

ziq wrote

you fash entryists never quit

6

lempamo wrote

as an ACTUAL anarcho-communist, i know that your idea of a "transitional state" is a load of marxist bullshit and is not at all anarchist

6

_caspar_ wrote

and as if on cue, the weekly raddle NPC returns.

6

GlangSnorrisson wrote

Ok which one of you folks went and woke up the Xi-ple?

6

Ennui wrote

You’re like the roach that crawls out of the cracks in my ceiling, whispers inane nonsense about how dialectical toilet water is, and then promptly gets eaten by my cats every night. You’re the reason they have indigestion and throw up on my rugs. You bastard.

4

BionicShrimp wrote

Do you think lenin was an anarchist? Because this:

I believe a transitionary state is needed to get to the money-free stateless society that is anarcho communism.

Is exactly what lenin said.

3