Submitted by communistanarchist in Anarchism
As a communist anarchist, I believe a transitionary state is needed to get to the money-free stateless society that is anarcho communism. This used to be the more common strain of anarchism, to be a communist who wants to achieve anarchist after the revolution but here it seems to be a minority current somehow? Why is that?
catachresis wrote
this is literally Marxism.
There is no after. Revolution is always happening. What you might be thinking of is called civil war.
Idk. Why are insisting that anarchy is compatible with transitional states and shitposting on other posts here?