Submitted by JUGhead in Anarchism

A lot of ancom philosophers are very wealthy. For example Mr. Chomsky is a millionaire who made his fortune writing books. In an ancom society would you take all his wealth away and strike him down to the same level as everyone else even though he spent a lifetime working to be a millionaire? Shouldn't there be a transitional stage where people who have worked all their lives under capitalism get to keep the money they made and their property? Or why would they ever consent to ancom society?

−8

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Majrelende wrote (edited )

One reason you are so averse to anarchy is that you think of money and property and work and such as inherently good.

Make what you will of that.

9

mofongo wrote

Obvs, if Kropotkin can give up royalty for anarchy then Chomsky can give up his money for anarchy too. Anyone that doesn't is no anarchist.

5