so uh, speaking as a person who is clearly out of the loop on whatever drama you're refering to
if you think someone should be banned you should make make a specific call out directed at them articulating what they have done which warrants them being banned. A person can act abusive or destructive without explicitly breaking the rules, and you shouldn't' be afraid to hold people accountable. If there isn't some kind of procedure for holding people accountable then maybe that's something we need to work on.
But just calling somebody a "sociopathic liar" (a little ableist there) and refusing to name names is not helpful at all, maybe this person actually hasn't committed any bannible offense, and you just have some weird personal beef with them. Idfk
Let's just get it out into the open. If there is a legitimate reason to ban someone, why not just say who you mean and make your case? If it is apparently bad enough to make this thread, why not have the discussion in earnest?
autonomous_hippopotamus wrote
so uh, speaking as a person who is clearly out of the loop on whatever drama you're refering to
if you think someone should be banned you should make make a specific call out directed at them articulating what they have done which warrants them being banned. A person can act abusive or destructive without explicitly breaking the rules, and you shouldn't' be afraid to hold people accountable. If there isn't some kind of procedure for holding people accountable then maybe that's something we need to work on.
But just calling somebody a "sociopathic liar" (a little ableist there) and refusing to name names is not helpful at all, maybe this person actually hasn't committed any bannible offense, and you just have some weird personal beef with them. Idfk