For now, this is the only re-vote that I believe is urgent and in most clear need of a revote. I've spoken to some of the others who initiated failed proposals (like zombie_b and gnu_ponut), and they showed hesitation in re-voting on those. So I will leave it up to others to propose re-votes on anything else they believe was conducted unfairly.
This re-vote proposal deals with whether /f/mediation should remain as a "first step" in conflicts, or if no clear ToS violation took place, among established users as outlined in w/mediation.
If you oppose /f/mediation as part of a formal process, we can always leave /f/mediation as a general conflict resolution forum.
Edit to be clear:
Support = /f/mediation remains as is as outlined in /w/mediation (and in the meta sidebar)
Oppose = We remove mentions of /f/mediation as a policy. It can be disbanded or used for voluntary conflict resolution, rather than part of a formal process.
Edit#2: Changed language to specify mediation as a policy
Random_Revolutionary wrote
Support, we don't really need to clutter up meta with user drama.